Your Cart is currently empty.
Right through the ages we find this universal sense of Divine inspiration - this feeling that a wisdom beyond that of man shapes the destiny of States; that the institutions of men are but the imperfect instruments of a Divine and beneficent energy; helping their higher aims. Should not we, sir, grant the prayer of the many petitions that have been presented to us, by recognising at the opening of our great future our dependence upon God?
|
Have you not heard of Social Credit?
$12.73
$9.55 You Save: 25.00% |
$33.64
$25.23 You Save: 25.00% |
$7.27
$5.45 You Save: 25.00% |
$4.55
$3.41 You Save: 25.00% |
$13.64
$10.23 You Save: 25.00% |
$5.45
$4.09 You Save: 25.00% |
$18.18
$13.64 You Save: 25.00% |
$18.18
$13.64 You Save: 25.00% |
$16.82
$12.61 You Save: 25.00% |
$20.00
$15.00 You Save: 25.00% |
$16.36
$12.27 You Save: 25.00% |
$20.00
$15.00 You Save: 25.00% |
Info: Your browser does not accept cookies. To put products into your cart and purchase them you need to enable cookies.
 View Full-Size Image |
Bechamp or Pasteur, Lost Chapter in History of Biology (E.Hume) |
|
|
Price per Unit (piece):
$40.91
$30.68 You Save: 25.00% |
||
| Ask a question about this product | ||
R. Pearson's “Pasteur: Plagiarist, Imposter” was originally published in 1942, and is a succinct introduction to both Louis Pasteur and Antoine Bechamp, and the reasons behind the troubled relationship that they shared for their entire working lives. Whereas Pearson's work is a valuable introduction to a very complex topic, it is Ethel Douglas Hume's expansive and well documented “Bechamp or Pasteur? A Lost Chapter in the History of Biology,” which provides the main body of evidence. It covers the main points of contention between Bechamp and Pasteur in depth, sufficient to satisfy any degree of scientific or historical scrutiny, and it contains, detailed references to the source material and supporting evidence. Virtually no claim in Ms Hume's book is undocumented. The reader will soon discern, that neither Mr Pearson nor Ms Hume could ever be called fans of Pasteur or his 'science'. They both declare their intentions openly; that they wish to contribute to the undoing of a massive medical and scientific fraud. The publication of this present edition of their work is undertaken with complete empathy for that intention. |
||